Vicarious liability refers to a legal doctrine under which a franchisor can be held responsible for the actions or negligence of a franchisee or the franchisee’s employees, even if the franchisor was not directly involved. This liability depends on the degree of control the franchisor exercises over daily operations.
Vicarious liability in franchising arises when a court or regulatory authority holds a franchisor legally accountable for the wrongful acts or negligence of a franchisee or the franchisee’s staff. This typically occurs when the franchisor is found to have exercised significant control over the franchisee’s day-to-day business operations, such as hiring, firing, payroll, or direct supervision. While franchisees are legally independent businesses, courts may "pierce the veil" of independence if it appears that the franchisor’s oversight crosses into employer-like control. Most franchise agreements explicitly state that franchisees are independent contractors and not agents or employees of the franchisor; however, that language alone does not shield the franchisor if their actual conduct suggests otherwise. Vicarious liability claims are common in cases involving personal injury, wage disputes, harassment, or employment law violations.
Additional Definition: In franchising, “vicarious liability” typically refers to claims brought against a franchisor alleging that it is responsible for the action (or inaction) of a franchisee or one of its franchisee's employees or agents.
Learn more about franchising in The Educated Franchise - 3rd Edition
The issue of vicarious liability has become increasingly important in franchise law, especially since the rise of large service and retail franchise systems. Key court cases—including Awuah v. Coverall North America and Patterson v. Domino’s Pizza—have helped clarify the boundaries of franchisor liability. In recent years, government agencies like the U.S. Department of Labor and National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) have examined whether franchisors should be treated as “joint employers,” which could expand vicarious liability exposure. While current legal trends favor limiting franchisor liability when appropriate boundaries are maintained, the issue remains fluid and highly fact-specific.
Vicarious liability is a legal risk for franchisors that arises when courts determine the franchisor had enough control over a franchisee’s operations to be held responsible for their actions. While franchise agreements often label franchisees as independent contractors, actual practices determine liability exposure. Understanding and managing vicarious liability is essential for maintaining legal protection while supporting consistent brand operations.
