Vertical Restraints

 

✅ Short Definition

Vertical restraints are restrictions placed by a franchisor on how a franchisee may operate within the supply and distribution chain, such as pricing, territory, and sourcing requirements. These restraints occur between parties at different levels of the business structure. In franchising, they help protect brand standards and uniformity.

🧾 Long Definition

Vertical restraints in franchising refer to contractual limits that a franchisor imposes on its franchisees to control how products and services are sold, sourced, or priced. Unlike horizontal restraints—agreements between competitors—vertical restraints occur between businesses operating at different levels in the supply chain (e.g., a franchisor and a franchisee). Common examples in franchising include minimum resale pricing policies, exclusive territories, mandated suppliers, and non-compete clauses. These provisions are generally designed to ensure brand consistency, protect market structure, and improve customer experience. While vertical restraints can raise antitrust concerns if they restrict competition excessively, they are often allowed under U.S. law if they are deemed “reasonable” and pro-competitive. Franchise agreements typically outline these restraints in detail, and they are legally enforceable as long as they don’t violate federal or state antitrust laws.

Additional Definition: Restrictions imposed by a franchisor on its “downstream” customer or franchisee. An example of such restraint may be a limitation on where a franchisee may offer and sell products or services. Also see “Price Fixing.” and Horizontal Restraints

Learn more about franchising in The Educated Franchise - 3rd Edition

🕰️ History and Usage

Definition of vertical restraints in franchisingThe concept of vertical restraints has long been examined under antitrust law, particularly under the Sherman Act and later under the rule of reason framework adopted by U.S. courts. In the context of franchising, vertical restraints became more common in the 1970s and 1980s as franchisors sought tighter control over brand experience and operational standards. Landmark court cases—such as *Continental T.V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.*—shifted how vertical restraints were treated, moving from a per se illegal standard to a more flexible rule-of-reason approach. Today, franchisors rely heavily on vertical restraints to regulate pricing consistency, sourcing quality, and market exclusivity, though they must be careful not to cross into anti-competitive territory.

📋 Common Examples of Vertical Restraints in Franchising
  • Exclusive Territories: Preventing other franchisees or the franchisor from operating in the same geographic area.
  • Approved Suppliers: Requiring franchisees to purchase inventory or equipment only from designated vendors.
  • Minimum Advertised Pricing (MAP): Restricting how low franchisees can price certain goods or services.
  • Online Sales Restrictions: Prohibiting sales outside of approved platforms or geographic zones.
  • Non-Compete Clauses: Preventing franchisees from operating competing businesses during or after the franchise term.
❓ Five Common Questions About Vertical Restraints
  1. Are vertical restraints legal in franchising?
    Yes, if they are reasonable and serve a legitimate business interest; they are evaluated under the rule of reason.
  2. Do vertical restraints affect pricing?
    They can, particularly when franchisors impose minimum resale pricing or MAP policies.
  3. Can a franchisor limit where a franchisee buys supplies?
    Yes, many franchise agreements include approved supplier lists to ensure quality control.
  4. Are vertical restraints disclosed in the FDD?
    Yes, related obligations are generally found in Items 8, 12, and 16 of the Franchise Disclosure Document.
  5. What’s the difference between vertical and horizontal restraints?
    Vertical restraints occur between different levels of the supply chain; horizontal ones occur between competitors.
📝 Examples of Common Usage for Vertical Restraints
  • 'The franchise agreement included vertical restraints that required all beverages to be purchased from franchisor-approved vendors.'
  • 'To avoid pricing wars, the franchisor imposed a vertical restraint through a minimum advertised pricing policy.'
  • 'The franchisee challenged the vertical restraint on territorial exclusivity, claiming it restricted their ability to grow.'
📌 Summary

Vertical restraints are legal tools used by franchisors to control critical aspects of franchisee operations, including pricing, sourcing, and territories. While these restrictions promote brand uniformity and operational efficiency, they must be carefully structured to avoid violating antitrust laws. Understanding vertical restraints is essential for both franchisors and franchisees to ensure compliance and protect the integrity of the franchise system.

Buying a Franchise? Let the Franchisee Resource Center Help
Get Help
Review Hundreds of FDD’s from top franchises - view the site.
View FDDs
You can buy & download current FDD’s in the industry in one place!
 Buy FDDs
The Insiders Guide | Find the Perfect Franchise for you
Buy the 3rd Edition
© 2021 | The Educated Franchisee | All Rights Reserved
Powered by Saint George